Dixter

Dixter promotes itself as a hot amateur website. Amateur guys having sex is fine for gay porn and can often be hot, take Broke Straight Boys as a prime example. But amateur should not apply to the makers of the website and the producers, Dixter I’m afraid is about as amateur as it gets. This site is super low budget. It’s the porn equivalent of a B horror movie. It’s badly made, badly shot and not a sexy site. I don’t expect grade A production values in a gay porn world (yet it’s nice when it happens) but it has to meet some sort of minimum to be enjoyable.

The layout is very simple almost ridiculously so. The home page features individual pics of the “models” and I use the term loosely because most of these guys aren’t very hot. Although some of them have an aging porn star quality to them. Each model had some photos in their galleries, yet most of the shots were lame.

Then there is the cheaply shot granny video. This site looks like it was shot by third graders in their parent’s garage (can they do that). They don’t even bother to make it look hot; they just turn on the camera and hope these guys look sexy performing on what looks like a twenty year sofa from Ikea. Does Ikea know how much of their furniture in porn (yes that was a random thought)

To make it worse, there aren’t many models to choose from. Also, almost all the action is solo, so it makes the site even duller. The only hot action is a duo with Matt and Hunter At least Hunter has a hot ass. The only good solo is Brock who is kind of sexy in a Clark Kent kind of way. He seems to enjoy himself in front of the camera. In the hands of better filmmakers he might be really hot. So please save your money on this one and subscribe to something steamier. Dixter is really just lamester.